[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[david@kalifornia.com: Re: problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM]



	FYI, it seems the latest X CVS has the SHM problem fixed.
-- 
tv@{{hq.yok.utu,havoc,gaeshido}.fi,{debian,wanderer}.org,stonesoft.com}
unix, linux, debian, networks, security, | The Web site you seek
kernel, TCP/IP, C, perl, free software,  | cannot be located but
mail, www, sw devel, unix admin, hacks.  | endless others exist
--- Begin Message ---
Shaw Starr repored on xpert@xfree86.org that a fresh checkout of 4.01d and fresh
build of X resulted in a fixed/working shm w/ X.

-d

safemode wrote:

> When in doubt. . Blame it on the biggest piece of crap around ..  X.    One can
> say using a cvs of X is the cause of this by somehow i doubt it would matter.  X
> needs a sane make system and i'll bet 10:1 that it's the root of this shm usage.
> But it should not be crashing the OS ...which does occur since i just went down a
> couple minutes ago.  Right now it's increasing 1 segment a second it seems.  it's
> at 1200 now and i give it about 30 more minutes before i crash again.  I'm gonna
> run this on the test8-vm3 patched kernel i had before that was VERY good except
> for that deadlock problem that caused me to crash after 7 days.   If the shm usage
> is insane on that then i'll believe it is X's fault.      be back with the results
> in a few minutes.

--
      "There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are
      virtue and talents", Thomas Jefferson [1742-1826], 3rd US President


begin:vcard 
n:Ford;David
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
org:<img src="http://www.kalifornia.com/images/paradise.jpg";>
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:david@kalifornia.com
title:Blue Labs Developer
x-mozilla-cpt:;28256
fn:David Ford
end:vcard

--- End Message ---

Reply to: