On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 01:02:00PM -0800, Mark Montague wrote: > > It's been addressed, but I don't think anyone's produced anything > > [snip] > Hmmmm.... I haven't even looked at the 3.3.6 stuff... maybe I should... > > I'm in about the same boat; I occasionally try to put something > together, get confused, and leave it for a while. At least I am > getting closer with each attempt, though... > > [snip] > > I'd be interested in some collaboration and discussion on this > packaging... is there anyone out there who has a more solid plan for > 3.9 already? > Agreed. Could someone come up with a list of pkgs that would need to be replaced by 3.9? If someone would, I'd be more than willing to build a single .deb for the whole thing (That'll be the extent of my ability, I fear) that provides the necissary pkgs. AFA both 3.9 and 3.3.6 being on the same system, that's *way* beyond my ability. Would be neat, though... -- andyw p.s. CC me again... I think I'll actually subsribe this time...
Attachment:
pgpAeQhNdaO52.pgp
Description: PGP signature