Re: Wiki: Remove some outdated pages?
On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 01:51:31PM +0100, Thomas Lange wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:39:10 +0000, Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> said:
>
> > Why remove documentation on what has been considered and done in the
> > web team? What harm are those pages causing?
>To improve the ratio between good and outdated content.
Just because content is not super-fresh, that does not make it
*bad*. What happens when people start planning another project and
look for documentation about what was considered and what happened
last time, for example?
This is *not* user-facing documentation, this is documentation about
what has been worked on inside the web team. By all means move/rename
it under the team's area in the wiki, but *don't* just remove it
because it's old.
Deletion of history *for the sake of it* is not helpful.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
'There is some grim amusement in watching Pence try to run the typical
"politician in the middle of a natural disaster" playbook, however
incompetently, while Trump scribbles all over it in crayon and eats some
of the pages.' -- Russ Allbery
Reply to: