On Thu, 2025-01-30 at 17:47 +0800, Maytham Alsudany wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 2025-01-19 at 23:31 +0100, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote: > > second, having looked at the freebsd and archlinux wikis, I'm starting to think > > that: > > > > - high quality content is about boring process (doing small, well scoped > > changes, much like one would do with code; having people actively review them; > > and roll back changes when they don't follow certain clearly-communicated > > guidelines) > > IMO the main issues with the current wiki, regardless of content, is: > - Pages are unorganised and fragmented. > Related pages should be grouped together rather than all being on the > top level. There are plenty of examples of this in the wiki, one > example would be all the different packaging tutorials in the wiki. > - Lack of guidelines. > I agree with the fact that we need better, enforceable guidelines on > content that can be included on the wiki, especially with redirecting > certain types of content elsewhere. And on that point: > - Duplication of content. > The wiki repeats a lot of things that are already better documented > elsewhere. For instance, I don't see the point of an install guide on > the wiki when there's already an existing official one. I've written a draft[1] for guidelines that could be used on the wiki. I'd welcome any edits or discussion on the points there. > -- Maytham [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/MaythamAlsudany/DraftContentGuidelines
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part