+1, +1 I think Debian has to think about what content we would like to have in our wiki. We need some simple (!) rules and people who review the content and also can say "no, thanks, that does not fit into our wiki". The last thing would be something very new to our wiki. A filter process so we get better content. Do we want to continue our wiki as is, or move more to a better qualitiy wiki like arch linux has?
Hi, arriving late, but wanted to check if this is still being discussed.My two cents on this, for normal use, the debian wiki is fine as it is. It's perfectly searchable (I think) and the content is great and relevant to debian. Although like any wiki, it could use more regular updates on some advanced topics.
I doubt the detailed user-manual style of ArchWiki is going to fit on debian's wiki, as the manuals are normally published elsewhere and debian has a lot more content about its own tooling/architecture/etc.
But it would be nice to see all manuals for debian docs available publicly, like what you get with "/var/lib/dochelp/documents.html".
(but that's not wiki related) When I tried to edit a page, that's a different story.- The signup process through email is a big bottleneck. No single-sign on is not a big deal, but it's one way to fight spam without manually admitting people (or just a captcha). - Table syntax and styling are tedious to say the least. Compare that to mediawiki where it's more line-by-line and a little more readable on a webpage - Another tiny preference is dark mode. Some days, you just can't stare at a bright white wiki page for too long.
Anyway, I was curious if wiki admins considered mediawiki (or any other wiki) and if there is a need for any help there? I never managed a live mediawiki, but plenty of CMS (wordpress and friends).
Disclaimer, I haven't yet made a single edit on the wiki even though it keeps going into edit mode when I double click to select :)
-- Regards, Ahmad