Your message dated Mon, 21 Oct 2024 11:38:44 -0400 with message-id <41d9c3e26c26786e0c195ef9fd8f72aa62b795ae.camel@debian.org> and subject line Re: [www.debian.org] improve the list of releases (webwml/english/releases/index.wml) has caused the Debian Bug report #883300, regarding [www.debian.org] improve the list of releases (webwml/english/releases/index.wml) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 883300: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883300 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: [www.debian.org] improve the list of releases (webwml/english/releases/index.wml)
- From: Laura Arjona Reina <larjona@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 21:55:07 +0100
- Message-id: <6ed26f90-134e-efe3-ea6c-479ae7089ead@debian.org>
Package: www.debian.org User: www.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertag: content Severity: normal Tags: patch Hello all Several improvements for the list of releases that is currently in www.debian.org/releases (source webwml/english/releases/index.wml) have been suggested in the debian-www mailing list: [1],[2]. Filing a bug so they don't get lost: * Specify the oldstable and old-oldstable releases in the list (currently we just mark testing, stable, and all the rest as "obsolete stable release"). Proposal diff attached, not sure about the wording of the term "oldoldstable" or if using those technical terms at all. * Maybe a table would be a better way to structure the list, we could take some inspiration from Ubuntu or other distros and list the dates. E.g. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2017/11/msg00081.html [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2017/11/msg00082.html Best regards -- Laura Arjona Reina https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjonaIndex: index.wml =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/releases/index.wml,v retrieving revision 1.69 diff -u -r1.69 index.wml --- index.wml 25 Nov 2017 12:30:13 -0000 1.69 +++ index.wml 25 Nov 2017 15:54:19 -0000 @@ -81,18 +81,18 @@ <li><a href="<current_testing_name>/">The next release of Debian is codenamed <q><current_testing_name></q></a> - — no release date has been set + — <q>testing</q>, no release date has been set </li> <li><a href="stretch/">Debian 9 (<q>stretch</q>)</a> - — current stable release + — current <q>stable</q> release </li> <li><a href="jessie/">Debian 8 (<q>jessie</q>)</a> - — obsolete stable release + — <q>oldstable</q> release </li> <li><a href="wheezy/">Debian 7 (<q>wheezy</q>)</a> - — obsolete stable release + — <q>oldoldstable</q> release, under LTS support </li> <li><a href="squeeze/">Debian 6.0 (<q>squeeze</q>)</a>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 883300-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [www.debian.org] improve the list of releases (webwml/english/releases/index.wml)
- From: Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 11:38:44 -0400
- Message-id: <41d9c3e26c26786e0c195ef9fd8f72aa62b795ae.camel@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <6ed26f90-134e-efe3-ea6c-479ae7089ead@debian.org>
- References: <6ed26f90-134e-efe3-ea6c-479ae7089ead@debian.org>
On Fri, 1 Dec 2017 21:55:07 +0100 Laura Arjona Reina <larjona@debian.org> wrote: > Package: www.debian.org > User: www.debian.org@packages.debian.org > Usertag: content > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > > Hello all > Several improvements for the list of releases that is currently in > www.debian.org/releases (source webwml/english/releases/index.wml) have > been suggested in the debian-www mailing list: [1],[2]. Filing a bug so > they don't get lost: > > * Specify the oldstable and old-oldstable releases in the list > (currently we just mark testing, stable, and all the rest as "obsolete > stable release"). Proposal diff attached, not sure about the wording of > the term "oldoldstable" or if using those technical terms at all. > > * Maybe a table would be a better way to structure the list, we > could take some inspiration from Ubuntu or other distros and list the > dates. E.g. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases > > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2017/11/msg00081.html > [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2017/11/msg00082.html I believe the changes are merged in https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/merge_requests/1005 , and the commit has entered the webwml repository at https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/commit/b74c72b1d58678fff1dda7322cc9b11bc6ec6ad8 . Thanks, Boyuan YangAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---