[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#855695: packages.debian.org shows non-existing binutils packages on arm64



Hi Jochen,

(Answering with my “I have the gid by accident” hat.)

Jochen Sprickerhof <jspricke@debian.org> (2023-01-20):
> There are more old files that should probably go:
> 
> jspricke@picconi:/srv/packages.debian.org/archive/debports$ find -type f -mtime +0 -exec ls -l {} \;
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pkg_user pkg_maint 1029950 Nov  6  2014 ./experimental/Contents-arm64.gz
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pkg_user pkg_maint 1817658 Mai 19  2019 ./experimental/main/binary-powerpcspe/Packages.gz
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pkg_user pkg_maint 9198 Mai 19  2019 ./experimental/main/debian-installer/binary-powerpcspe/Packages.gz
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pkg_user pkg_maint 20 Nov  6  2014 ./experimental/main/debian-installer/binary-arm64/Packages.gz
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pkg_user pkg_maint 316060 Nov  6  2014 ./experimental/main/binary-arm64/Packages.gz
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pkg_user pkg_maint 5221435 Mai 19  2019 ./experimental/Contents-powerpcspe.gz
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pkg_user pkg_maint 27303127 Nov  6  2014 ./sid/Contents-arm64.gz
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pkg_user pkg_maint 95517 Mai 19  2019 ./sid/main/debian-installer/binary-powerpcspe/Packages.gz
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pkg_user pkg_maint 98536 Nov  6  2014 ./sid/main/debian-installer/binary-arm64/Packages.gz
> -rw-r--r-- 1 pkg_user pkg_maint 38478639 Mai 19  2019 ./sid/Contents-powerpcspe.gz

Looks good to me, all gone.

> There is also arm, avr32, mips, powerpcspe, s390 and sparc listed in
> /srv/packages.debian.org/config.sh. I guess they can be removed as well.

Given the git checkout is in the following state, I don't think it's
reasonable for me to touch anything else:

    pkg_user@picconi:/srv/packages.debian.org$ git diff --stat|tail -1
     52 files changed, 12833 insertions(+), 10634 deletions(-)


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: