[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#856691: marked as done (Minor tweaks to webpages about the bug-tracking system)

Your message dated Fri, 20 Oct 2023 20:47:52 +0200
with message-id <25906.52056.998096.684418@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #856691,
regarding Minor tweaks to webpages about the bug-tracking system
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
856691: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856691
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package:  www.debian.org
Severity:  minor

Can the following 3 things be clarified on the website: 

 * The item in the e-mails below about X-Debbugs-No-Ack & other pseudo-headers. 

 * On https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer there is a Table-of-Contents entry
that says:  "Recording that you have passed on a bug report".  This can sound
like "pass" in the Python programming language, i.e., "ignored."  Maybe this
can be reworded like "Recording that you have notified someone else of a bug
report". 

 * On https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting , about 2/3 of the way down, it
says "If wish to report" instead of "If you wish to report". 

Thanks. 

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: No-Ack pseudo-header didn't seem to work
From: don@debian.org
To: dg1727 <dg1727@protonmail.com>
owner@bugs.debian.org <owner@bugs.debian.org>

On Fri, 03 Mar 2017, dg1727 wrote:

> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854326#10 has an
> X-Debbugs-No-Ack pseudo-header, but I got an ack e-mail anyway.
>
> https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting says "the contents of this
> header do not matter".

The psuedoheader parsing code is a bit different from the header parsing
code, and requires that there is a content after the colon. [This
limitation doesn't exist for the headers, though.]

So... the content doesn't matter, but pseudoheaders need content.

--
Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
I've fixed the third of your things.
The other things do not seem to be that important, because noone else
complained about this. IMO there's no need to fix those, so closing.

-- 
regards Thomas

--- End Message ---
Reply to: