[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#813341: marked as done (www.debian.org: Decide a place where to store logos so services can hotlink there)

Your message dated Tue, 3 Oct 2023 08:32:45 +0200
with message-id <25883.46477.173541.377716@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #813341,
regarding www.debian.org: Decide a place where to store logos so services can hotlink there
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
813341: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813341
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Dear all
We have the official logos in https://www.debian.org/logos/ in several sizes
and formats.

People running other Debian services may hotlink there instead of storing local
copies of the logo.

In addition to that, we may create a folder under english/logos, with some name
('special', or other), where to store, for example, mourning logos, so we can
better coordinate when we want to change the logos in all the Debian service
infrastructure.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.3
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

the issue was fixed, we now have a location containing the logos.
Therefore closing this bug.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: