[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1018959: marked as done (List differences in short identifiers between SPDX and DEP-5)

Your message dated Sat, 03 Sep 2022 11:52:56 +0800
with message-id <bdd225c0775207d8b8138e74390bb0d4d7c0e5fd.camel@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1018959: List differences in short identifiers between SPDX and DEP-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1018959,
regarding List differences in short identifiers between SPDX and DEP-5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1018959: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1018959
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wiki.debian.org

For example, the short identifier for GNU General Public License v3.0
or later is GPL-3.0-or-later in SPDX, but GPL-3+ in DEP-5. List such
differences in the wiki[1] as proposed in DEP-5 itself. Also elaborate
whether this will be changed in the future. FSF itself prefers the
SPDX form and requests using them.

[1] https://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Fri, 2022-09-02 at 20:15 +0500, Akbarkhon Variskhanov wrote:

> Package: wiki.debian.org

The wiki.debian.org package isn't for reporting issues with the wiki
content, only for the service itself, so closing the bug now.

> For example, the short identifier for GNU General Public License v3.0
> or later is GPL-3.0-or-later in SPDX, but GPL-3+ in DEP-5. List such
> differences in the wiki[1] as proposed in DEP-5 itself.

In case you want to make these changes yourself, I've just marked your
email for auto-accept so things should work OK if you try to register
an account. Please let us know if you have any problems.

> Also elaborate whether this will be changed in the future.
> FSF itself prefers the SPDX form and requests using them.

I think this would be something for the Debian Policy Team:

https://salsa.debian.org/dbnpolicy/policy/blob/master/README.md
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Policy

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
Reply to: