[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#896067: marked as done (doc-debian: missing text on https://www.debian.org/devel/constitution)

Your message dated Fri, 9 Apr 2021 19:39:56 +0200
with message-id <20210409173956.GL28013@beskar.mdcc.cx>
and subject line Re: Constitution A.6 - "V(A,D) is strictly great"
has caused the Debian Bug report #896067,
regarding doc-debian: missing text on https://www.debian.org/devel/constitution
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
896067: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896067
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: doc-debian
Version: 6.4
Severity: normal

I noticed that the sentence of Item A.6.3.2 isn't finished. I can only
assume that the constitution is correct, and this web page is not complete.

Paul

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: missing text on https://www.debian.org/devel/constitution
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 23:45:49 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
To: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 08:39:18PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Kurt,
> 
> Following your previous mail with the result of the election of DPL, I
> went to https://www.debian.org/devel/constitution.
> 
> I noticed that the sentence of Item A.6.3.2 isn't finished. I can only
> assume that the constitution is correct, and this web page is not
> complete. Are you able and empowered to fix this?

The text comes from the doc-debian package as far as I know. It's
at least wrong there too. That line was last modified by this GR:
https://www.debian.org/vote/2015/vote_003

Could you file a bug against doc-debian?


Kurt

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi Laura,

Last uploader of doc-debian here.

On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 06:45:47PM +0200, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
> 
> I have changed the constitution files in the website repo to match the
> updated text currently now in doc-debian package:
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/commit/e3d525d9f092f9014e00417cc847900ac5a99649
> 
> The fix will be available online after the next build.

Great, thanks.

> I didn't close the bug because I don't know if a decision has been taken
> about which one of the two sources (website repo or debian-doc package
> repo) should be the "canonical" one. In my opinion, the website, but I'm
> biased of course :-)

Yes, the website is the canonical one.  The doc-debian build infra in a way
refers to the website.  (I did an evil hack for last upload to speed up the
fix.)

Closing the bug.

Bye,

Joost

--- End Message ---
Reply to: