[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#871659: marked as done (www.debian.org: scripts: Debian GNU/Linux FAQ should not be typesetted on webserver but webserver should use faq .deb (was: Re: [...] Debian Documentation BoF @ DebConf17 [...]))



Your message dated Fri, 1 May 2020 21:26:09 +0200
with message-id <[🔎] 20200501212609.f8798a9b51c1dd02a99c5c8b@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#871659: www.debian.org: scripts: Debian GNU/Linux FAQ should not be typesetted on webserver but webserver should use faq .deb
has caused the Debian Bug report #871659,
regarding www.debian.org: scripts: Debian GNU/Linux FAQ should not be typesetted on webserver but webserver should use faq .deb (was: Re: [...] Debian Documentation BoF @ DebConf17 [...])
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
871659: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=871659
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hi,

Previous, in
https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20170806213642.GA17680@beskar.mdcc.cx :

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 11:06:54PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 11:36:42PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 06:38:51PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 01:06:40PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
<snip>
> > > >  We'll be discussing the state of Debian's Documentation, what we would
> > > >  like it to be (the Arch wiki?), and how to get there.
> > <snip> 
> > The BoF was not video-d
<snip>
> > Here's the "slides", and, more importantly, some notes/conclusions reached.
> > 
> >           Debian Documentation BoF
> >                     by
> >         you and Joost van Baal-Ilić
<snip>
> >       DebConf17, Montréal, august 2017
<snip>
> > Notes taken during the discussion
> > - faq should not be typesetted at webserver; website should use .deb of faq
<snip>

The Debian GNU/Linux FAQ, as publised at
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/ , is one of the very few of our
documents which gets fetched from VC and build/typesetted by the webserver;
most other documents use the content as shipped by the document's .deb
packages.  The latter scheme is better since it saves resource usage on our
webserver.  We loose frequent updates of the web-published content.  However,
the source content of our documents is no longer updated very frequently
anyway, so I feel we're ready for using the .deb.

I plan to fix this bug myself.  Note to self: hack on
ssh://git.debian.org/git/debwww/cron.git (Thanks Osamu Aoki.)

Bye,

Joost

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Joost van Baal-Ilić <joostvb-debian-bugs-20170810-9@mdcc.cx> wrote:
> The Debian GNU/Linux FAQ, as publised at
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/ , is one of the very few of our
> documents which gets fetched from VC and build/typesetted by the webserver;
> most other documents use the content as shipped by the document's .deb
> packages.  The latter scheme is better since it saves resource usage on our
> webserver.  We loose frequent updates of the web-published content.  However,
> the source content of our documents is no longer updated very frequently
> anyway, so I feel we're ready for using the .deb.

This has been changed in the meantime, so closing this bug.


Holger


-- 
Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org>
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508  3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076

--- End Message ---

Reply to: