Your message dated Wed, 17 Jul 2019 01:21:47 +0200 with message-id <23854.23563.240705.155186@informatik.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing bug has caused the Debian Bug report #613832, regarding www.debian.org: Debian sister association in the merchandise page to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 613832: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613832 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: www.debian.org: Debian sister association in the merchandise page
- From: Luca Capello <luca@pca.it>
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:31:17 +0100
- Message-id: <87ipwi7k56.fsf_-_@gismo.pca.it>
- In-reply-to: <201102171548.43246@fortytwo.ch> (Adrian von Bidder's message of "Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:47:08 +0100")
- References: <87tyg2g6ed.fsf@gismo.pca.it> <201102171548.43246@fortytwo.ch>
Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Hi there! I think we need to document this somewhere and with my events@d.o hat on this is the BTS. Please keep it cc:ed when the discussion is relevant or follow-up on debian-www@: this is a website problem, as I just wrote in the announcement for the new events@d.o handling [1]. [1] Message-ID: <87tyg2g6ed.fsf@gismo.pca.it> URL: <http://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/%3c87tyg2g6ed.fsf%40gismo.pca.it%3e> The original email I replied to is at [2]. [2] Message-ID: <201102171548.43246@fortytwo.ch> URL: <http://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/%3c201102171548.43246%40fortytwo.ch%3e> On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:47:08 +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > On Thursday 17 February 2011 14.03:22 Luca Capello wrote: >> [14] <http://www.debian.org/misc/merchandise> > > Hmm. Umbrellas are missing in debian.ch's entry :-) Noted, but I still need to acquaint myself with WML [3], if someone from the Webmaster team wants to quickly fix it, please go on. [3] <http://www.debian.org/devel/website/> > More importantly: on one hand, we don't endorse any specific vendor, but > otoh debian.ch isn't a commercial vendor but the money owned by it is fully > under the authority of the Debian project. I wonder if this should be > indicated. Perhaps for each shop add to the listing "commercial vendor" / > "commercial vendor, part of the income goes to the Debian project" / "part > of the Debian project"? Not sure what the exact terms should be, but I > guess at least some people will be happy to prefer ordering stuff from > places that are closely linked with Debian. Yesterday, while reviewing debian-www@ spam [4] I found out something related which should be taken care of when we are going to restructure that page [5]. No flames, please. [4] <http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Webmaster/SpamClean#preview> [5] Message-ID: <20100526143008.GA19199@anguilla.debian.or.at> URL: <http://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/%3c20100526143008.GA19199%40anguilla.debian.or.at%3e> > (Disclaimer: Yes, I *am* on the debian.ch board.) Again, no flames, please. That being said, it does not matter who is on the board and who is not and for those who do not know that already, I am the current debian.ch president. Yes, debian.ch *is* a special case, no matter what other people say. It is a special case exactly as any other *official* Debian sister association. Yes, I agree that we need a special case for these sister association, but *only* if, as Adrian already wrote in his reply, the money that they own is under the authority of the Debian project. Thx, bye, Gismo / LucaAttachment: pgpP5CEdDrNf7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 613832-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc:
- Subject: closing bug
- From: Thomas Lange <lange@informatik.uni-koeln.de>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 01:21:47 +0200
- Message-id: <23854.23563.240705.155186@informatik.uni-koeln.de>
I'm closing this bug because IMO there's no need to work on this. There was a discussion about how to sort this list, but nothing was done during the last 7 years. So it's not really important. Citing a comment in this bug report: "I would argue against such an over-complication of the merchandise page: we should keep it as simple as possible, so the information can be found instantaneously" I agree and close this bug. -- regards Thomas
--- End Message ---