[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#859122: marked as done (1 DLA missing from the website (or not))

Your message dated Fri, 27 Sep 2019 17:36:49 +0000
with message-id <20190927173649.hlbqbmqq4p3vvglq@layer-acht.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#859122: 31 DLAs missing from the website
has caused the Debian Bug report #859122,
regarding 1 DLA missing from the website (or not)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
859122: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859122
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hi!

First, thanks for doing the work of importing DLAs and DSAs in the
website, it is greatly appreciated.

However, during a discussion on the debian-lts@ mailing list, we have
noticed that DLAs since squeeze LTS support was terminated have not
been imported:

https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts/2017/03/msg00205.html

An excerpt from the discussion:

> Here's the bits that are missing:
> 
>  * the last DLA on the website is DLA-445-2, which is basically the last
>    DLA before squeeze support ended and wheezy was handed over
> 
>  * among those 445 DLAs, there are actually 31 missing:
> 
>    webwml$ cd english/security/; find -name 'dla-*.wml' | wc -l
>    424
> 
>  * even worse, it seems there are at least 20 advisories missing from
>    the website because regression uploads hide advisories, because our
>    naming convention differs from DSA ("DLA-XXX-N", where XXX is the
>    original advisory and N are regression updates)
> 
>    $ grep DLA- data/DLA/list | sed 's/.* DLA-//;s/ .*//' | sort -n | sed '/445-2/,$d' | wc -l
>    465
> 
>  * the canonical list has 928 advisories:
> 
>    secure-testing$ grep DLA- data/DLA/list | wc -l 
>    928

Is there any reason why new DLAs have not been imported?

Is there anything we can do to help in completing that import?

I will open a separate ticket regarding possible automation shortly.

Thanks!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: armhf

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi Brian and *,

On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 05:34:49PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> Not sure why you referenced dla-377 - is there something wrong with this
> one?

yes but this commit in webwml.git fixed it:

[master 2c291090ef1] dla-377 was released on 2015-12-31

Which means: now all old DLAs are available on www.debian.org, yay!

Thanks to everyone involved making this happen!


-- 
cheers,
	Holger

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
       PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: