[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#613832: marked as done (www.debian.org: Debian sister association in the merchandise page)

Your message dated Wed, 17 Jul 2019 01:21:47 +0200
with message-id <23854.23563.240705.155186@informatik.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #613832,
regarding www.debian.org: Debian sister association in the merchandise page
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
613832: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613832
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hi there!

I think we need to document this somewhere and with my events@d.o hat on
this is the BTS.  Please keep it cc:ed when the discussion is relevant
or follow-up on debian-www@: this is a website problem, as I just wrote
in the announcement for the new events@d.o handling [1].

[1] Message-ID: <87tyg2g6ed.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
    URL: <http://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/%3c87tyg2g6ed.fsf%40gismo.pca.it%3e>

The original email I replied to is at [2].

[2] Message-ID: <201102171548.43246@fortytwo.ch>
    URL: <http://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/%3c201102171548.43246%40fortytwo.ch%3e>

On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:47:08 +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> On Thursday 17 February 2011 14.03:22 Luca Capello wrote:
>> [14] <http://www.debian.org/misc/merchandise>
>
> Hmm.  Umbrellas are missing in debian.ch's entry :-)

Noted, but I still need to acquaint myself with WML [3], if someone from
the Webmaster team wants to quickly fix it, please go on.

[3] <http://www.debian.org/devel/website/>

> More importantly: on one hand, we don't endorse any specific vendor, but 
> otoh debian.ch isn't a commercial vendor but the money owned by it is fully 
> under the authority of the Debian project. I wonder if this should be 
> indicated.  Perhaps for each shop add to the listing "commercial vendor" / 
> "commercial vendor, part of the income goes to the Debian project" / "part 
> of the Debian project"?  Not sure what the exact terms should be, but I 
> guess at least some people will be happy to prefer ordering stuff from 
> places that are closely linked with Debian.

Yesterday, while reviewing debian-www@ spam [4] I found out something
related which should be taken care of when we are going to restructure
that page [5].  No flames, please.

[4] <http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Webmaster/SpamClean#preview>
[5] Message-ID: <20100526143008.GA19199@anguilla.debian.or.at>
    URL: <http://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/%3c20100526143008.GA19199%40anguilla.debian.or.at%3e>

> (Disclaimer: Yes, I *am* on the debian.ch board.)

Again, no flames, please.

That being said, it does not matter who is on the board and who is not
and for those who do not know that already, I am the current debian.ch
president.

Yes, debian.ch *is* a special case, no matter what other people say.  It
is a special case exactly as any other *official* Debian sister
association.

Yes, I agree that we need a special case for these sister association,
but *only* if, as Adrian already wrote in his reply, the money that they
own is under the authority of the Debian project.

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca

Attachment: pgpP5CEdDrNf7.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
I'm closing this bug because IMO there's no need to work on this.

There was a discussion about how to sort this list, but nothing was
done during the last 7 years. So it's not really important.

Citing a comment in this bug report:
"I would argue against such an over-complication of the merchandise page:
we should keep it as simple as possible, so the information can be found
instantaneously"

I agree and close this bug.

-- 
regards Thomas

--- End Message ---
Reply to: