[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#147164: ping and new proposal

On Lu, 08 apr 19, 16:06:11, Thomas Lange wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 16:54:21 +0300, Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> said:
>     > I would suggest this should read "Every document must have at least one 
>     > active maintainer" (regardless of what the Maintainer: field contains).
> So you mean the usual Debian package maintainer? Then we do not need
> to mention this explicitly, but better say that every manual should
> be also a Debian package. Are there manuals which are not in Debian
> package? 

What I meant was that every document should be actively maintained 
(content wise).

Whether it's packaged is an implementation detail (in my opinion not 
even a requirement), so it doesn't really matter what the Maintainer: 
field says.

Kind regards,

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: