[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#657938: marked as done (Please, update w.d.o/intro/search)

Your message dated Fri, 3 Aug 2018 14:24:12 +1200
with message-id <20180803022412.GA32724@survex.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#657938: Please, update w.d.o/intro/search
has caused the Debian Bug report #657938,
regarding Please, update w.d.o/intro/search
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
657938: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657938
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: www.debian.org@packages.debian.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

19:35 < raphael> heh, I didn't know this page even exists http://www.debian.org/intro/search.en.html
19:44 < taffit> seems only linked from http://www.debian.org/intro/ 
19:44 < taffit> raphael: it could be a better link than http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMailingLists/SearchHowto on the search page
19:55 < raphael> taffit: not really, the search syntax on the www.d.o page doesn't work on omega
19:58 < taffit> So, should http://www.debian.org/intro/search be updated to match the documentation in http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMailingLists/SearchHowto ;?
20:01 < raphael> taffit: yep, except that by default the search terms are ANDed
20:02 < raphael> in fact, http://xapian.org/docs/queryparser.html is even more accurate
20:04 < raphael> but nothing below and including "Searching within a probabilistic field" is really useful for search.d.o

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=NVUo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:02:19PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> 19:35 < raphael> heh, I didn't know this page even exists http://www.debian.org/intro/search.en.html
> 19:44 < taffit> seems only linked from http://www.debian.org/intro/ 
> 19:44 < taffit> raphael: it could be a better link than http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMailingLists/SearchHowto on the search page
> 19:55 < raphael> taffit: not really, the search syntax on the www.d.o page doesn't work on omega
> 19:58 < taffit> So, should http://www.debian.org/intro/search be updated to match the documentation in http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMailingLists/SearchHowto ;?
> 20:01 < raphael> taffit: yep, except that by default the search terms are ANDed
> 20:02 < raphael> in fact, http://xapian.org/docs/queryparser.html is even more accurate
> 20:04 < raphael> but nothing below and including "Searching within a probabilistic field" is really useful for search.d.o

It sounds like there's scope for rationalising different places where
we document the search syntax.

But while we still have this it ought to be correct so for now I've
updated it to matches the current search behaviour:

https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/commit/ef5d84a9f9c8f7bb3a4cb07e541ab38bba95994e

Cheers,
    Olly

--- End Message ---
Reply to: