[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#877424: marked as done (Cleanup iPhone manual and prepare for stretch)



Your message dated Mon, 2 Oct 2017 18:22:26 +0100
with message-id <20171002172226.GA25158@copernicus.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#877424: closed by Brian Potkin <claremont102@gmail.com> (Re: Bug#877424: Cleanup iPhone manual and prepare for stretch)
has caused the Debian Bug report #877424,
regarding Cleanup iPhone manual and prepare for stretch
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
877424: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=877424
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wiki.debian.org

Please update https://wiki.debian.org/iPhone .

As of today, this manual has nothing to offer for Debian stretch 9.1 and iOS 11.0.1. The various solutions for older combinations fail for me. Even worse, this manual seems to be in a raw, cluttered state even for older Debian versions. Please test and update with at least one working scenario for this combination.

Ideally, this manual should let the user choose his/her Debian version, his/her iOS version, and direct him/her to the corresponding howto.

Thanks in advance,
Leon

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon 02 Oct 2017 at 22:09:15 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:

> On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 14:44 +0200, Leon Meier wrote:
> 
> > It could be a business decision, so, I will send a non-public e-mail.
> 
> I should point out that Debian is a non-profit and we are not a legal
> entity, so we don't carry out business related activities.

May I also point out that mails pointing out defects and deficiencies
in wiki pages are not too infrequent on debian-user. The response is
generally along the lines of "Guess what? It's a wiki." The OP very
often respond saying they now understand the purpose of a wiki but
decline to take it further, sometimes because they think their limited
knowledge would not be up to the job of undertaking the task. This is
fair enough and understandable.

I do not think I have ever seen a response from a poster proposing a
commercial relationship, either seriously or in jest.

You are not obligated to contribute anything to any page; but neither
is anyone else. Also, Package: wiki.debian.org is for filing bugs
against the operation of the wiki, not for bringing about changes in
its contents. The latter is in the hands of its users.

Closing this report again on those grounds.

Regards,

Brian.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: