[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#659066: marked as done (www.debian.org: [fr] inconsistent capitalization of 'Développeurs', 'Contrat social' and 'Comité technique' in the Social Contract)

Your message dated Sun, 15 Jan 2017 01:25:45 +0100
with message-id <783f91d3-dd34-f1ae-213a-7ae3a422e161@debian.org>
and subject line www.debian.org: [fr] inconsistent capitalization of 'Développeurs', 'Contrat social' and 'Comité technique' in the Social Contract
has caused the Debian Bug report #659066,
regarding www.debian.org: [fr] inconsistent capitalization of 'Développeurs', 'Contrat social' and 'Comité technique' in the Social Contract
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
659066: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=659066
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Usertags: pca.it-l10n

Hi there!

Cc:ing the debian-l10n-french@ mailing list for comments and
doc-debian-fr@p.d.o because the bug is in this package.

While reading the French version [1] of the Social Contract for my talk
tomorrow at the Open Source Now 2012 [2], I discovered that there is an
inconsistency in the capitalization of the first letter of the word
'Développeurs': at §2.1 and §4.1 it is uppercase, while every other
times it is lowercase.  Similarly for 'Contrat social' at §4.1.5.2 and
'Comité technique' at §6.

[1] <http://www.debian.org/devel/constitution.fr.html>
[2] <http://www.debian.org/events/2012/0207-opensourcenow>

Given how English terms have been translated (always with a lowercase
first letter), I would say that the use at §2.1, §4.1, §4.1.5.2 and §6
is wrong.

However, IMHO we should keep these words as in the English version,
i.e. with a uppercase first letter.  This is the situation in all the
other languages but Danish and Swedish.

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Attachment: pgpZsSp9hAAaV.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi everybody
I've reviewed the current version of the constitution in french:

https://www.debian.org/devel/constitution.fr.html

And it seems that all the inconsistencies reported in this bug are
gone, except for the first mention of Comité technique in section 6.1.

Given that that mention is the one containing the link, I assume that
this bug is fixed and the mentioned capitalization is intentional.

Closing the bug in www.debian.org pseudopackage, thus, and CC'ing the
French team for the case they want to review themselves this issue in
their team.

Thanks
-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona

--- End Message ---
Reply to: