Bug#750410: marked as done (www.debian.org: broken dsc/tar.gz links for wheezy-backports source packages)
Your message dated Sun, 10 Apr 2016 02:34:44 +0200
with message-id <CAOSaayX-QZghHkgrGDqbtQyU3guBOSAfJye2A-OkYpvS=YhWDg@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #750410,
regarding www.debian.org: broken dsc/tar.gz links for wheezy-backports source packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
750410: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750410
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: www.debian.org: broken dsc/tar.gz links for wheezy-backports source packages
- From: Michael Prokop <mika@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 10:31:44 +0200
- Message-id: <2014-06-03T10-29-10@devnull.michael-prokop.at>
- Message-id: <20140603083144.3856.66061.reportbug@grmlvrs>
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Noticed it on
https://packages.debian.org/source/wheezy-backports/backports/linux-latest
which refers to
http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports/pool/main/l/linux-latest/linux-latest_57~bpo70+1.dsc
http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports/pool/main/l/linux-latest/linux-latest_57~bpo70+1.tar.gz
while both files are non-existent (as in 404), the files are
available on the common (non-backports) Debian mirrors though, e.g.:
ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux-latest/linux-latest_57~bpo70+1.dsc
ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux-latest/linux-latest_57~bpo70+1.tar.gz
regards,
-mika-
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi.
I just rolled out a new version of packages.debian.org and I think
this issue is fixed.
Regards,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
--- End Message ---
Reply to: