Fw: Re: Should we mark #388141 as jessie-ignore?
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:47:53 -0800
Don Armstrong <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2015, Riley Baird wrote:
> > In any case, even if there is interest in closing this bug, it is
> > definitely more of a long-term thing and is unlikely to be fixed before
> > the jessie release. Because of this, would it be okay to mark it as
> > "jessie-ignore"?
> There's no point in marking bugs in psuedo packages jessie-ignore;
> they're ignored for the purpose of releasing jessie anyway.
Ah, I didn't know that.