On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:05:17PM +0200, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: Thanks for the patch! I like it, and it was sorely needed. > I'm not sure if for applicants to non-uploading DD there's an > alternative requirement for the "6 months being Debian Maintainer", so I > wrote "you should have been contributing to Debian for about six months". It could just be "you should have a visible and significant track record of work inside the project". > <li>Debian Developer (DD): The traditional full membership role in Debian. A DD > -can upload any package and can participate in Debian elections. Before applying > -as DD, you should have been a DM for about six months.</li> > + can participate in Debian elections. Packaging DDs can upload any package to the archive. Before applying as packaging DD, you should have been a DM for about six months. Non-packaging DDs have no permissions in the archive. Before applying as non-packaging DD, you should have been contributing to Debian for about six months.</li> > + It's probably time to corrent the "DM for 6 months" thing, since it doesn't make sense for people who work in teams like the Perl team where it's trivial to find sponsors. I propose: "Before applying as packaging DD, unless you usually do your work inside a team you should have been a DM for about six months." > <li>is member of the Debian project;</li> > <li>is allowed to vote about issues regarding the whole project;</li> > <li>can log in on most systems that keep Debian running;</li> > - <li>has upload permissions for <em>all</em> packages;</li> > + <li>has upload permissions for <em>all</em> packages > + (except non-uploading Developers, to whom this permission is not granted);</li> I would just say "except non-uploading Developers": "to whom this permission is not granted" sounds redundant and mean to me. Enrico -- GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature