Hi, Le 06/09/2014 16:59, Tomas Pospisek a écrit : > could you please review/comment on the proposed patch in > > http://bugs.debian.org/757943 Please give some context next time you’re referring to a bug (one may not have full network access when reading or replying to a mail. Lucky me, I’ve the recent archive of the list locally available). Note: it’s about the documentation of $(SITE) and alike WML variables. > Is it needed and helpful? Is it useless? Is it missing something? Should > it somehow be improved? Can or should it be applied as is? NACK: it uselessly points to alioth URLs, doesn’t explain what it does (which should make clear we prefer local link instead on external ones) and mixes http with https (which I assume should be preferred, even if no actual communication was made around it to at least present its benefit AFAICT). Yet, htmlediting.wml seems a good place for it (IIRC the WML page is more technical). I should try and propose another wording when I’ve time to do so, thanks Tomas for trying anyway (and apologies for not replying sooner: I’ve delayed to be able to be more positive, but didn’t yet took the time for it, sorry)! Regards David
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature