Bug#736858: marked as done (mirror listing update for debian.cc.lehigh.edu)
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:11:59 +0000
with message-id <E1W7tTL-0005Ao-PB@moszumanska.debian.org>
and subject line Debian WWW CVS commit by spaillard fixes #736858
has caused the Debian Bug report #736858,
regarding mirror listing update for debian.cc.lehigh.edu
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
736858: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736858
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: mirrors
Severity: minor
Submission-Type: update
Site: debian.cc.lehigh.edu
Type: leaf
Archive-architecture: amd64 i386
Archive-http: /debian/
Archive-rsync: debian/
Backports-http: /debian-backports/
Backports-rsync: debian-backports/
IPv6: no
Archive-upstream: debian.lcs.mit.edu
Backports-upstream: ftp.at.debian.org
Updates: push
Maintainer: Keith Erekson <keith.erekson@gmail.com>
Country: US United States
Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
Sponsor: Lehigh University http://www.lehigh.edu/
Comment: 1 Gbps connection, multiple ISPs including Internet2 connectivity
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This bug was closed by spaillard in the webwml CVS repository:
http://www.debian.org/devel/website/using_cvs
Note that it might take some time until www.debian.org has been updated.
CVSROOT: /cvs/webwml
Module name: webwml
Changes by: spaillard 14/01/27 21:11:59
Modified files:
bulgarian/CD/jigdo-cd: index.wml
Log message:
sync with 1.80
Modified files:
english/mirror : Mirrors.masterlist
Log message:
debian.cc.lehigh.edu: +backports and various updates (Closes: #736858)
--- End Message ---
Reply to: