Hi, Le 22/06/2012 03:36, Luca Capello a écrit : > […] ATM this process does not > automatically grant webwml access, something the Events team did not > realize beforehand. > > How should we proceed and improve future inclusions? IMHO webwml access > should be automatically granted I think it would be a terrible idea, and recent examples seems to backup this statement. > (obviously, with hints to the webwml > documentation), given that Events members should be able to modify > w.d.o/events pages. Does the WWW team agree or should each new member > ask for such an access? I do believe the event team should take care of training their new members, and commit file they prepare after proper proofread and test. Once the trainees do a good job, vouch for them and ask the webmasters to grant them write access, as any other team. Event team, please check that my last fixes [0] are correct. Those are not grave mistakes, but they are numerous (including those in a past few days). Please don't push on other's shoulders the burden to take care of your section of the website. Please, do *not* commit translated pages without proofread by the related l10n team (and please consider asking for proofread of English pages on debian-l10n-english@l.d.o anyway). Regards David > 0: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/webwml/webwml/english/events/2012/0924-guaiba.wml?r1=1.2&r2=1.3
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature