On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 05:36:22PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 05:36:04PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit : > > We've also been advised not to relicense the "with 'Debian'" logo under > > a so-called "liberal" license like the Expat license. > > thanks a lot for solving that embarassing situation with our logo's license. > Just for our education, what is the rationale behind this recommendation of SFLC/SPI ? The risk of trademark naked licensing (under both common and trademark law, AFAIU). Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . zack@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Debian Project Leader . . . . . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature