[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#682317: marked as done ([www.debian.org] Technical committee: wrong date on node resolution)

Your message dated Sun, 22 Jul 2012 21:44:14 -0700
with message-id <20120723044414.GB5015@teltox.donarmstrong.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#682317: [www.debian.org] Technical committee: wrong date on node resolution
has caused the Debian Bug report #682317,
regarding [www.debian.org] Technical committee: wrong date on node resolution
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
682317: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682317
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor

http://www.debian.org/devel/tech-ctte.en.html#status contains:
  • 2012-06-12 Bug #614907: nodejs must use /usr/bin/nodejs, node must change to ax25-node and provide /usr/sbin/ax25-node, and transition packages and legacy packages defined.

The committee actually decided on #614907 in July (month 07), not in June. The regression comes from http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/webwml/webwml/english/devel/tech-ctte.wml?r1=1.45&r2=1.46

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> The committee actually decided on #614907 in July (month 07), not in
> June.

Resolved. Thanks for the report.


Don Armstrong

-- 
She was alot like starbucks.
IE, generic and expensive.
 -- hugh macleod http://www.gapingvoid.com/Moveable_Type/archives/001376.html

http://www.donarmstrong.com              http://rzlab.ucr.edu

--- End Message ---
Reply to: