Bug#660950: Re: Bug#660950: [www.debian.org] Awards: broken link for Linux+ entry

[Filipus Klutiero <chealer@gmail.com>]

Hi David,

On 2012-04-04 18:03, David Prévot wrote:
> Le 23/02/2012 16:37, Filipus Klutiero a écrit :
> > On 2012-02-22 22:15, David Prévot wrote:
> > > Le 22/02/2012 22:39, Filipus Klutiero a écrit :
> > >
> > > > The Awards page entry of April 2006 about Linux+ links to
> > > > http://www.lpmagazine.org/fr which yields a 404 error.
> 	$ ./smart_change.pl -s 's,www.(lpmagazine.org/)fr,\1,' \
> 		english/misc/awards.wml
>
> fixed it

Thanks

> > > It seems that you totally missed Simon's point yesterday,  so let me try
> > > to offer you some subtitles.
> > >
> > > Le 22/02/2012 18:27, Filipus Klutiero a écrit :
> > > > On 2012-02-21 15:46, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > > > > - you could avoid the overhead of BTS ?
> > > > Hum, overhead when compared to what?
> > > Compared to sending a simple mail to debian-www@l.d.o…
> > I don't see much overhead in using the BTS instead...
> But we, the people who are actually taking care of these issues, do.

Hum, I - for one - do not.
> > > > > - send a patch against cvs ?
> > > > I do know that I could send a patch ...
> > > So please, do it!
> > To be clear, I consider it
> > inefficient to send patches for trivial issues of the kind.
> But we, the people who are actually taking care of these issues, don't.

Some of us might not, but I do.
> > > It would be far more efficient to review and apply a simple patch.
> > To clarify, I was talking about the efficiency of the process as a
> > whole,
> So am I.

Well, the process as a whole is not just reviewing and applying a patch.