Bug#660950: [www.debian.org] Awards: broken link for Linux+ entry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
user www.debian.org@packages.debian.org
usertag 660950 content misc
severity 660950 minor
thanks
Hi Filipus,
Le 22/02/2012 22:39, Filipus Klutiero a écrit :
> The Awards page entry of April 2006 about Linux+ links to
> http://www.lpmagazine.org/fr which yields a 404 error.
It seems that you totally missed Simon's point yesterday, so let me try
to offer you some subtitles.
Le 22/02/2012 18:27, Filipus Klutiero a écrit :
> On 2012-02-21 15:46, Simon Paillard wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:26:04PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
>> Do you know that, for such trivial change:
>> - you could avoid the overhead of BTS ?
>
> Hum, overhead when compared to what?
Compared to sending a simple mail to debian-www@l.d.o…
>> - send a patch against cvs ?
>
> I do know that I could send a patch ...
So please, do it!
> but I also know that wouldn't be
> very efficient for trivial problems of this kind.
It would be far more efficient to review and apply a simple patch. A
patch would make a lot more clear what the issue actually is, and since
you already thought about it, the fix you propose. Reading a certain
amount of lines that doesn't always totally make sense is not the most
efficient way to communicate for trivial problems of this kind…
>> - you could ask a alioth account and just fix the webpage yourself ?
>> http://www.debian.org/devel/website/using_cvs
As already stated on another mailing list, I would actually be a bit
reluctant to grant commit access to someone who has not yet proven
himself able to propose an actual patch.
In other words, Filipus, please provide patches for trivial problems
directly to debian-www@l.d.o. Once we've witnessed that you're actually
able to offer something useful, we'd be happy to grant you commit access
so you can fix them directly.
Regards
David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)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=/yfQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: