[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#660950: marked as done ([www.debian.org] Awards: broken link for Linux+ entry)

Your message dated Wed, 04 Apr 2012 18:03:05 -0400
with message-id <4F7CC519.3040104@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#660950: [www.debian.org] Awards: broken link for Linux+ entry
has caused the Debian Bug report #660950,
regarding [www.debian.org] Awards: broken link for Linux+ entry
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
660950: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660950
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
The Awards page entry of April 2006 about Linux+ links to http://www.lpmagazine.org/fr which yields a 404 error. I don't know what Linux+ is, but being recommended by it is probably not that glorious, I'd recommend just removing the entry. Calling a recommendation an award is a bit of a stretch anyway. 

http://www.debian.org/misc/awards.en.html

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Le 23/02/2012 16:37, Filipus Klutiero a écrit :
> On 2012-02-22 22:15, David Prévot wrote:

>> Le 22/02/2012 22:39, Filipus Klutiero a écrit :
>>
>>> The Awards page entry of April 2006 about Linux+ links to
>>> http://www.lpmagazine.org/fr which yields a 404 error.

	$ ./smart_change.pl -s 's,www.(lpmagazine.org/)fr,\1,' \
		english/misc/awards.wml

fixed it

>> It seems that you totally missed Simon's point yesterday,  so let me try
>> to offer you some subtitles.
>>
>> Le 22/02/2012 18:27, Filipus Klutiero a écrit :
>>> On 2012-02-21 15:46, Simon Paillard wrote:

>>>> - you could avoid the overhead of BTS ?

>>> Hum, overhead when compared to what?

>> Compared to sending a simple mail to debian-www@l.d.o…

> I don't see much overhead in using the BTS instead...

But we, the people who are actually taking care of these issues, do.

>>>> - send a patch against cvs ?

>>> I do know that I could send a patch ...

>> So please, do it!

> To be clear, I consider it
> inefficient to send patches for trivial issues of the kind.

But we, the people who are actually taking care of these issues, don't.

>> It would be far more efficient to review and apply a simple patch.
> 
> To clarify, I was talking about the efficiency of the process as a
> whole,

So am I.

Regards

David

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: