[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#238245: license choice - consensus on dual MIT/GPL-2 ?

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:11:48PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> [ TL;DR: would you object re-licensing www.d.o content under dual
>   MIT/Expat + GPL-2 ? ]

> What do you think?
I am happy for all my contributions I have done for the Debian website
(which admittedly have not been a lot recently) including any of the
scripts or php dynamic pages (if any are left) to be re-licensed 
under the dual-license MIT/Expat and GPL-2+ I'm not sure if nm.d.o
carries any of my code anymore but it covers that.

I have no problems with the "or later" and actually consider it an
essential part of the license for GPL.

FWIW anything I contribute in future can also be licensed under this
dual license too.

Stefano, there's a bunch of stuff at SPI I did too, let me know if they
want something similar.  I cannot remember now what I said about their
logo for example.

 - Craig

Craig Small VK2XLZ   http://enc.com.au/          csmall at : enc.com.au
Debian GNU/Linux     http://www.debian.org/      csmall at : debian.org
GPG fingerprint:     5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2  0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: