[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#265388: marked as done (www.debian.org: don't need so deep pngs)



Your message dated Fri, 11 Feb 2011 01:05:49 +0100
with message-id <20110211000549.GA20435@glenfiddich.ikibiki.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#265388: www.debian.org: don't need so deep pngs
has caused the Debian Bug report #265388,
regarding www.debian.org: don't need so deep pngs
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
265388: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=265388
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

$ wget http://www.debian.org/logos/openlogo-nd-50.png
$ file openlogo-nd-50.png
openlogo-nd-50.png: PNG image data, 50 x 61, 8-bit colormap, non-interlaced

Perhaps only 1-bit is all that is needed? Well, at least not all 8.
Same for some of the other graphics.
P.S. are .gif's cool these days? I see lots on your site.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 06:43:57AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> $ wget http://www.debian.org/logos/openlogo-nd-50.png
> $ file openlogo-nd-50.png
> openlogo-nd-50.png: PNG image data, 50 x 61, 8-bit colormap, non-interlaced
> 
> Perhaps only 1-bit is all that is needed? Well, at least not all 8.
> Same for some of the other graphics.

Png need 8 bit for proper rendering, it costs only 2KB for the Debian logo.
Png files have been optimized using optipng.

> P.S. are .gif's cool these days? I see lots on your site.

No more gifs today.

Closing the bug.

-- 
Simon Paillard


--- End Message ---

Reply to: