Bug#612120: www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-i386 is missing
David Prévot, le Sun 06 Feb 2011 23:50:26 -0400, a écrit :
> Le 05/02/2011 22:39, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> > Simon Paillard, le Sun 06 Feb 2011 03:30:48 +0100, a écrit :
> >> On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 03:25:10AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >>> Wolodja Wentland, le Sun 06 Feb 2011 01:46:09 +0000, a écrit :
> >>>> http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-i386/ is missing and results in a
> >>>> 404.
> >>>
> >>> Yes, that's expected, it's http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu/ for
> >>> both.
> >>> Where did you see that bogus URL?
> >>
> >> http://debian.org/releases/squeeze/
> >> We link according to the arch name.
> >
> > Ok, that's actually collusion. In the debian manual, we separate arch
> > name from port website name.
>
> Hi kFreeBSD team,
>
> We are wondering if the kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 would deserve
> their own http://www.debian.org/ports/ pages. It may be the more
> consistent approach regarding existing directory name (alpha, amd64,
> arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, powerpc, s390, sparc, sparc64, etc.)
> but this choice is up to you.
>
> If there is no point in maintaining both the ports/kfreebsd-amd64 and
> ports/kfreebsd-i386 pages, we could try to tweak the auto-generated
> links about kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 to actually point to
> ports/kfreebsd-gnu, but since those links maybe automatically generated
> in other documents like release-notes or installation-guide, we may also
> need to prepare a 301 redirection from ports/kfreebsd-amd64 and
> kfreebsd-i386.
The installation guide already correctly generates the links.
Samuel
Reply to: