Bug#612253: marked as done (Broken [Report it!])
Your message dated Mon, 7 Feb 2011 09:30:41 +0100
with message-id <20110207083041.GO11027@ftbfs.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#612253: Broken [Report it!]
has caused the Debian Bug report #612253,
regarding Broken [Report it!]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
612253: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612253
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; 2011-02-07 00:16:54 UTC
Site layout problem report button on the footer's link is broken.
(http://www-broken-layout.debian.org/cgi-bin/layout-problem.cgi is HTTP404)
--
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
<ishikawa@debian.org>, <ishikawa@hanzubon.jp>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
On Mon Feb 07, 2011 at 16:02:31 +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Version: N/A; 2011-02-07 00:16:54 UTC
>
> Site layout problem report button on the footer's link is broken.
> (http://www-broken-layout.debian.org/cgi-bin/layout-problem.cgi is HTTP404)
fixed. We did a small fix yesterday, so we can address all the mirrors
in the www.d.o rotation directly, without having the redirect to
www.d.o. That fix itself broke www-broken-layout.debian.org this
morning. I have now changed the order of vhosts being loaded on
wolkenstein.d.o, which had fixed your problem.
Cheers,
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas <zobel@debian.org> | Debian System Administrator
Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster
Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc - KeyID: 5D64 F870
GPG Fingerprint: 5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7 302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870
--- End Message ---
Reply to: