[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#607193: document various download options/locations for Squeeze CD images



On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 11:54:51PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 11:10:01PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 15:32:50 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > Package: www.debian.org
> > > Severity: important
> [..]
> > > We should document that on the website before the Squeeze release, obviously
> > > the prominent links should point to Debian images; links to non-free firmware
> > > images should be provided under big fat warnings that they are not part of
> > > Debian and supported only to the extent that not having their source code
> > > permits. Maybe, a link to the announcement text of today
> > > (http://www.debian.org/News/2010/20101215) can be provided too?
> > > 
> > > I report this bug as important, as IMHO it should be fixed by the day Squeeze
> > > gets released.
> > > 
> > Ping.  What's the status here?
> 
> Thanks for the head-up, we will introduce a netinst-non-free-images tag for
> that, with some warning in read.
> 
> < Sledge> symoon: only netinst, yeah
> < Sledge> not going to waste time/space doing all of the variants
> < Sledge> and we do i386, amd64, powerpc and i386/amd64 multi-arch

http://people.debian.org/~spaillard/kdesign/d-i-non-free.en.html an idea of
what non-free could looks like in d-i pages (under devel here, but same for
squeeze).

Maybe the icon could be important instead of warning..

Thanks for your feedback.

You will notice there is no link to multiarch, because either filename scheme
(amd64-i386) doesn't match the dir name (defined by @ARCH@):
 1/ either we have direct links for all arches (but multiarch)
or
 2/ a working link to each dir including multiarch
...
 3/ rework the templates in "some way", hardcode multiarch filenames somewhere.



-- 
Simon Paillard



Reply to: