[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#510894: marked as done (www.debian.org: DWN Index for 2007 also shows 2006 issues)



Your message dated Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:04:25 -0400
with message-id <4DB57F69.20505@tilapin.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#510894: www.debian.org: DWN Index for 2007 also shows 2006 issues
has caused the Debian Bug report #510894,
regarding www.debian.org: DWN Index for 2007 also shows 2006 issues
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
510894: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=510894
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor

Looking at http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2007/index I see the
latest issue from 03 Jul 2007 up to 26 Sep 2006, but since this is a
yearly index page for 2007, it should stop at 23 Jan 2007.

-- 
      Dr. Helge Kreutzmann                     debian@helgefjell.de
           Dipl.-Phys.                   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
        64bit GNU powered                     gpg signed mail preferred
           Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Le 23/03/2011 17:14, victory a écrit :
> Tags: patch
> 
> past years only want the same year's and don't want to include previous year's.
> only CURRENT year wants more entry.

Great, thanks for digging it, I also applied your patch to
english/template/debian/projectnews/index.wml so it works also for the
2009 (but it doesn't work for the current year, of course, not sure it's
really an issue anyway, let's draft another DPN to grow this list).

Regards

David

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=GAmu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--- End Message ---

Reply to: