[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Let's have fun in bug triaging (Was: FYI & RFC: bug categorising)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

[ Links were broken in my previous mail ]

Le 12/12/2009 16:20, Simon Paillard a écrit :
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 04:25:37PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>> Today I fiddled around a bit with the BTS, and this is what I managed:
>> <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=www.debian.org&ordering=www-sort>
> [..] 
>> bts user www.debian.org@packages.debian.org . usertag 1234 + packages
> [..]

> As mentionned in IRC, uncategorized bugs should be displayed first.

Still a problem.

>>  More importantly I think it might make sense to use more categories,
>> but I haven't found ones that catch a fair bit to be really helpful
>> instead of just stretching the entry part.
> 
> Split bugs about content or design/CSS ?

The default page now shows those (usertags between bracket):

  + Content [content]
  + Design [design]
  + Scripts [scripts]
  + Packages.debian.org [packages]
  + Planet.debian.org [planet]

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=www.debian.org

The problem is that we lost the tags classification we used to have:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?ordering=old;src=www.debian.org

I also tried to provide both, but wonder if it's not a bit messy:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?ordering=www.debian.org-sort;src=www.debian.org

> An option is to add tag for directories, ex./News or /security/  
> r /CD/ or /Bugs/. 

Good idea, we can do both:

  + Bugs [bugs]
  + CD [cd]
  + Consultants [consultants]
  + Development [devel]
  + Distribution [distrib]
  + Documentation [doc]
  + Events [events]
  + International [international]
  + Intro [intro]
  + MailingLists [mailinglists]
  + Mirror [mirror]
  + Miscellaneous [misc]
  + News [news]
  + Partners [partners]
  + Ports [ports]
  + Releases [releases]
  + Security [security]
  + Users [users]
  + Vote [vote]
  + Packages.debian.org [packages]
  + Planet.debian.org [planet]

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?ordering=dir;src=www.debian.org

Any thought, comment, other idea?

Once the directory triage will be polished, I wonder if we could contact
related group (-doc, -cd, -ports, etc.) to help us in fixing bugs they
are the most concerned with, or even address this in a “bits from the
WWW-Team” if we have other stuff to talk about…

Regards

David


P.-S.: my last mail to control in order to set this up:

user www.debian.org@packages.debian.org
usercategory www-team-type
 * WWW-Team type [tag=]
  + Uncategorized []
  + Content [content]
  + Design [design]
  + Scripts [scripts]
  + Packages.debian.org [packages]
  + Planet.debian.org [planet]
usercategory www-team-dir
 * WWW-Team directories [tag=]
  + Bugs [bugs]
  + CD [cd]
  + Consultants [consultants]
  + Development [devel]
  + Distribution [distrib]
  + Documentation [doc]
  + Events [events]
  + International [international]
  + Intro [intro]
  + MailingLists [mailinglists]
  + Mirror [mirror]
  + Miscellaneous [misc]
  + News [news]
  + Partners [partners]
  + Ports [ports]
  + Releases [releases]
  + Security [security]
  + Users [users]
  + Vote [vote]
  + Packages.debian.org [packages]
  + Planet.debian.org [planet]
  + Uncategorized []
usercategory normal
 * status
 * www-team-type
 * severity
usercategory dir
 * status
 * www-team-dir
 * severity
usercategory www.debian.org-sort
 * status
 * www-team-type
 * severity
 * classification
usercategory old
 * status
 * severity
 * classification

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=Nn7w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: