Re: FYI & RFC: bug categorising
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[ Just made aware of this “old” thread via IRC, thanks ]
Le 12/12/2009 16:20, Simon Paillard a écrit :
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 04:25:37PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>> Today I fiddled around a bit with the BTS, and this is what I managed:
>> bts user firstname.lastname@example.org . usertag 1234 + packages
>> I haven't enabled this view as default because I'm not too sure what
>> others might think about it, and also because I don't think that this is
>> the final call.
> As mentionned in IRC, uncategorized bugs should be displayed first.
> That's what QA does using 'Cat1Order: N X Y Z...' with N the index of
> Uncategorized (that's what I see from BTS spool, I don't understand how
> to get this configuration inside the BTS).
Me neither, any hint welcome.
>> More importantly I think it might make sense to use more categories,
>> but I haven't found ones that catch a fair bit to be really helpful
>> instead of just stretching the entry part.
> Split bugs about content or design/CSS ?
That would be a good start, once triaged those, we may have a better idea.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----