[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: FYI & RFC: bug categorising



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

[ Just made aware of this “old” thread via IRC, thanks ]

Le 12/12/2009 16:20, Simon Paillard a écrit :
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 04:25:37PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>> Today I fiddled around a bit with the BTS, and this is what I managed:
>> <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=www.debian.org&ordering=www-sort>
> [..] 
>> bts user www.debian.org@packages.debian.org . usertag 1234 + packages
> [..]
>>  I haven't enabled this view as default because I'm not too sure what
>> others might think about it, and also because I don't think that this is
>> the final call.
> 
> As mentionned in IRC, uncategorized bugs should be displayed first.

+1

> That's what QA does using 'Cat1Order: N X Y Z...' with N the index of
> Uncategorized (that's what I see from BTS spool, I don't understand how
> to get this configuration inside the BTS).

Me neither, any hint welcome.

>>  More importantly I think it might make sense to use more categories,
>> but I haven't found ones that catch a fair bit to be really helpful
>> instead of just stretching the entry part.
> 
> Split bugs about content or design/CSS ?

That would be a good start, once triaged those, we may have a better idea.

Regards

David

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=lAth
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: