Bug#569789: marked as done (www.debian.org: d.o/releases says that lenny was released on 20100130)
Your message dated Sat, 02 Apr 2011 21:51:43 -0400
with message-id <4D97D2AF.1000007@tilapin.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#569789: www.debian.org: d.o/releases says that lenny was released on 20100130
has caused the Debian Bug report #569789,
regarding www.debian.org: d.o/releases says that lenny was released on 20100130
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
569789: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569789
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: www.debian.org: d.o/releases says that lenny was released on 20100130
- From: Serafeim Zanikolas <serzan@hellug.gr>
- Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:15:57 +0100
- Message-id: <20100214101557.3388.12875.reportbug@mobee>
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
http://www.debian.org/releases/ and
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/ state that:
The current stable distribution of Debian GNU/Linux is version 5.0.4,
codenamed lenny. It was released on January 30th, 2010.
but lenny was actually released on February 14th, 2009.
-S
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Serafeim Zanikolas <serzan@hellug.gr>, 569789-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino <jfs@debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Bug#569789: www.debian.org: d.o/releases says that lenny was released on 20100130
- From: David Prévot <david@tilapin.org>
- Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 21:51:43 -0400
- Message-id: <4D97D2AF.1000007@tilapin.org>
- In-reply-to: <20100214132117.GA2890__13686.1076149673$1266154933$gmane$org@mobee>
- References: <20100214101557.3388.12875.reportbug@mobee> <f3c99a81002140410m793797e6g2ef21971b6ed257f@mail.gmail.com> <20100214132117.GA2890__13686.1076149673$1266154933$gmane$org@mobee>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Le 14/02/2010 09:21, Serafeim Zanikolas a écrit :
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 01:10:59PM +0100, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote:
>> The text refers to the 5.0.4 release not to the lenny (5.0.0) release.
>> Since it is automatically generated maybe the phrase should be changed
>> to make this more obvious.
>
> Of course you're right. It's nevertheless confusing and a more explicit
> rephrase would be nice (perhaps something like ``lenny (5.0.0) was initially
> released on xxx and its latest update (5.0.4) was on yyy'')
Thanks for your report, the mentioned pages [1,2] have been fixed in
that regard, it will be on line in a few hours.
1: http://www.debian.org/releases/
2: http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/
Regards
David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)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=oI5p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: