Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi there!
I think we need to document this somewhere and with my events@d.o hat on
this is the BTS. Please keep it cc:ed when the discussion is relevant
or follow-up on debian-www@: this is a website problem, as I just wrote
in the announcement for the new events@d.o handling [1].
[1] Message-ID: <[🔎] 87tyg2g6ed.fsf@gismo.pca.it>
URL: <http://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/%3c87tyg2g6ed.fsf%40gismo.pca.it%3e>
The original email I replied to is at [2].
[2] Message-ID: <201102171548.43246@fortytwo.ch>
URL: <http://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/%3c201102171548.43246%40fortytwo.ch%3e>
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:47:08 +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> On Thursday 17 February 2011 14.03:22 Luca Capello wrote:
>> [14] <http://www.debian.org/misc/merchandise>
>
> Hmm. Umbrellas are missing in debian.ch's entry :-)
Noted, but I still need to acquaint myself with WML [3], if someone from
the Webmaster team wants to quickly fix it, please go on.
[3] <http://www.debian.org/devel/website/>
> More importantly: on one hand, we don't endorse any specific vendor, but
> otoh debian.ch isn't a commercial vendor but the money owned by it is fully
> under the authority of the Debian project. I wonder if this should be
> indicated. Perhaps for each shop add to the listing "commercial vendor" /
> "commercial vendor, part of the income goes to the Debian project" / "part
> of the Debian project"? Not sure what the exact terms should be, but I
> guess at least some people will be happy to prefer ordering stuff from
> places that are closely linked with Debian.
Yesterday, while reviewing debian-www@ spam [4] I found out something
related which should be taken care of when we are going to restructure
that page [5]. No flames, please.
[4] <http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Webmaster/SpamClean#preview>
[5] Message-ID: <20100526143008.GA19199@anguilla.debian.or.at>
URL: <http://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/%3c20100526143008.GA19199%40anguilla.debian.or.at%3e>
> (Disclaimer: Yes, I *am* on the debian.ch board.)
Again, no flames, please.
That being said, it does not matter who is on the board and who is not
and for those who do not know that already, I am the current debian.ch
president.
Yes, debian.ch *is* a special case, no matter what other people say. It
is a special case exactly as any other *official* Debian sister
association.
Yes, I agree that we need a special case for these sister association,
but *only* if, as Adrian already wrote in his reply, the money that they
own is under the authority of the Debian project.
Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
Attachment:
pgpvRENeJ2iAT.pgp
Description: PGP signature