[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#601050: marked as done (Broken Sponsors page link)



Your message dated Sun, 24 Oct 2010 22:21:58 +0200
with message-id <20101024202158.GB18311@glenfiddich.ikibiki.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#601050: Broken Sponsors page link
has caused the Debian Bug report #601050,
regarding Broken Sponsors page link
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
601050: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601050
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
package:www.debian.org


This link[1] is referred on main Debian portal[2], on the left navigator
panel, but is broken.




Greetings,

Dererk


ref:
1. http://www.debian.org/sponsor.html
2. http://www.debian.org

-- 
BOFH excuse #228:
That function is not currently supported, but Bill Gates assures us it will be featured in the next upgrade.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 12:53:50AM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
> severity 601050 minor
> thanks
> 
> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 09:24:25AM -0300, Dererk wrote:
> > Sorry about that. Answer's here:
> > www.debian.org.        3581    IN    TXT    "SA view"
> 
> debian.c3sl.ufpr.br
> I've notified the responsible for the Brazilian mirror.

Carlos fixed this, sponsor.html redirected :
wget -S --header="Host: www.debian.org" -O - -q http://debian.c3sl.ufpr.br/sponsor.html
  HTTP/1.1 302 Found
  Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:20:28 GMT
  Server: Apache/2.2.16
  Location: http://www.c3sl.ufpr.br
 
> To avoid such issues, we could just provide a default data, but filter them
> when using rsync, for example ignore further sync if the file is already
> existing.


-- 
Simon Paillard


--- End Message ---

Reply to: