[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#592170: marked as done (please add debconf delegates to intro/organisation)

Your message dated Mon, 9 Aug 2010 16:06:05 +0200
with message-id <20100809140605.GC12835@upsilon.cc>
and subject line Re: [Debconf-team] Bug#592170: please add debconf delegates to intro/organisation
has caused the Debian Bug report #592170,
regarding please add debconf delegates to intro/organisation
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
592170: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592170
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
package: www.debian.org
severity: wishlist
x-debbugs-cc: debconf-team@lists.debconf.org, dpl@debian.org, aj@azure.humbug.org.au

Hi,

please add DebConf and its Debian delegates somehow to 
http://www.debian.org/intro/organization

It's currently a bit unclear who the delegates are (and 
the delegation from 2006 should IMO be reviewed and renewed 
anyway), so for the moment this bug report should serve as 
a reminder to resolv this. 

Marga remembered that she, Ganneff and me (and probably others (*))
were delegates, but I couldnt find such a mail from aj to 
d-d-a now, which is no surprise to me, given that DebConf
has just ended. I could only find aj's statement in my AM 
report saying "Formal acceptance as a developer will allow 
Holger to [...] be more officially involved in DebConf 
organisation as a formal delegate should that be useful".


cheers,
	Holger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 12:46:17AM -0400, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Technically that was restricted to a venue decision for 2007 and was
> revoked later anyway [0] as part of making the decision using public
> criteria and an open IRC discussion (which aiui has only improved
> since).

Thanks for following up with this information!  Given that the
delegation was revoked, I'm now closing this bug report.

> Personally, I'd suggest just getting Stefano to do a new
> delegation of some active/key debconf people and ignore the old stuff.

Agreed, and the debconf-team people who attended the "debian vs debconf"
BoF should already know that I'm positive about that. I guess the issue
now is identifying the candidates for the delegation; it should probably
be postponed to the "debian vs debconf" discussion which is planned for
September.

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..|  .  |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: