Re: Debain DNS Documentation Discrepancy, .ref or .db?

To: Stephen Pflanze <artist@speakeasy.net>
Cc: debian-www@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Debain DNS Documentation Discrepancy, .ref or .db?
From: Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:38:40 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 20100315153840.GA17184@osamu.debian.net>
Mail-followup-to: Stephen Pflanze <artist@speakeasy.net>, debian-www@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4B9E42DF.30706@speakeasy.net>
References: <[🔎] 4B9E42DF.30706@speakeasy.net>

Hi,

This should have been posted to debian-user or debin-doc.
(Excuse me for replying)

On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 07:23:27AM -0700, Stephen Pflanze wrote:
> I had a point of confusion in the document:
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/network-administrator/ch-bind.html

Can you see something at the top of each page?

Debian GNU/Linux Network Administrator's Manual (Obsolete Documentation)
Chapter 8 - DNS/BIND 

Obsolete: of a discarded or outmoded type; out of date.

This is not supported.  Please use more recent documents documenting
current software.

Reply to:

References:
- Debain DNS Documentation Discrepancy, .ref or .db?
  - From: Stephen Pflanze <artist@speakeasy.net>

Prev by Date: Debain DNS Documentation Discrepancy, .ref or .db?
Next by Date: If you have a hardwood floor, times have changed.
Previous by thread: Debain DNS Documentation Discrepancy, .ref or .db?
Next by thread: If you have a hardwood floor, times have changed.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread