[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: debconf10 is _11th_ debian conference



On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 12:52:36PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> 
> Le 21/08/2010 12:00, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl a écrit :
> > Hi!
> > 
> > * Hideki Yamane <henrich@debian.or.jp> [100821 08:15]:
> >>>  Can the decision be evaluated again now that feedback is coming in
> >>> about the confusion on a to some degree regular basis - or at least can
> >>> we get an argumentation line on why we are actively hiding the existence
> >>> of a debconf for the benefit of reducing numbering confusion?
> > [..]
> >>  Anyway, "Tenth Annual Debian Developer Conference" in news page is wrong, 
> >>  please remove "tenth" or change it to "Eleventh".
> > 
> > Sorry, no.  Feel free to do decide whatever for future conference, but
> > the current webpage is an announcement that has been sent out the way it
> > is.
> 
> There is no point in keeping false affirmation on the website: it's OK
> to make mistake when writing an announcement in the hurry, anyway the
> message is stored in the mailing list archive, but there is no need to
> keep mistakes in the website.
> 
> I was about to commit the following change :
> 
> 	s/Tenth Annual Debian Developer Conf/2010 Annual Debian Conf/
> 
> (or maybe "The 2010 Annual Debian Conference", not sure for "The",
> please comment) as it sounded like a good idea and no one speak against
> this idea until now :
> 
> 	[🔎] 201008161217.32899.holger@layer-acht.org">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 201008161217.32899.holger@layer-acht.org
> 
> Please, add comment on this thread in hope we reach a consensus on this
> one and go on with other interesting stuff ;-).
> 
> Cheers
> 
> David

I agree with David: IMHO it's better to correct the title on the site.
Even if this grub-like numeration of DebConfs is very odd...

Cheers,
Francesca


Reply to: