Re: CVS webwml/english/consultants
* Andrei Popescu <email@example.com> [2010-07-21 17:49:45 CEST]:
> On Mi, 21 iul 10, 16:37:53, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > You replied to me personally only, not sure if that was on intention.
> I saw your mail in my Inbox first, not in the debian-www folder and
> didn't notice debian-www was in CC. There is no need to CC me if you
> reply to debian-www.
Especially on -www I picked up the habit to Cc people because often
enough people aren't subscribed (users usually, though) - sorry. :)
> > * Andrei Popescu <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2010-07-21 16:34:59 CEST]:
> > > We get requests from email@example.com to change the listing for
> > > firstname.lastname@example.org, there is no way for us to know the request is
> > > legitimate and have to ask back. Do you have a better idea/wording?
> > What I am saying is that asking back is needed anyway, it should be
> > part of the workflow. That's the same reason why mailing list
> > subscription isn't done out of the blue and requires confirmation.
> A confirmation from the same different address is also useless or am I
> misunderstanding your point?
I mean that everyone could mail as email@example.com - and if one is out
to abuse the system they definitely would choose to use firstname.lastname@example.org
as sender address and not email@example.com. Sending the confirmation
question to a different address of course might be considered useless,
though even then it would depend on case-by-case and there might be
valid reasons to do so.
Hope this was more clear what I mean.
"Lediglich 11 Prozent der Arbeitgeber sind der Meinung, dass jeder
Mensch auch ein Privatleben haben sollte."