[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#558610: marked as done (www.debian.org: Typo on a Todo Header)



Your message dated Tue, 1 Dec 2009 00:08:18 +0900
with message-id <20091130150818.GB8772@osamu.debian.net>
and subject line NOT A Bug#558610: www.debian.org: Typo on a Todo Header
has caused the Debian Bug report #558610,
regarding www.debian.org: Typo on a Todo Header
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
558610: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=558610
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor

In the Header "A buildd package", "build" is misspelled.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.3
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (600, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 10:46:21AM +0000, Heath Matlock wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: minor
> 
> In the Header "A buildd package", "build" is misspelled.

You are talking page at: http://www.debian.org/devel/todo/

(You should use explicit communication for bug report.)

grep helped me:

devel/todo/items/20buildd.wml:<item subject="A buildd package" url="mailto:roman@hodek.net"; urlname="Roman Hodek" taken-by="<a href="mailto:frankie@debian.org";>Francesco Paolo Lovergine</a>" rating=3 id=__FILE__>

This is correct: "buildd" is "build daemon" just like "httpd" is "http daemon".



--- End Message ---

Reply to: