Hi! Simon, this is not about you or your commit in particular, this is about a general misconcept that we are facing here currently. Am Freitag, den 24.10.2008, 16:03 -0600 schrieb CVS User spaillar: > Log Message: > Update press link after 4.0r5 release (Closes: #503312) [Dennis Guhl] > > > --- /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/releases/etch/index.wml 2008/07/29 21:11:06 1.16 > +++ /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/releases/etch/index.wml 2008/10/24 22:03:16 1.17 > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ > <p>Debian GNU/Linux <current_release_etch> was > released <current_release_date>. The release included many major > changes, described in > -our <a href="$(HOME)/News/2008/20080726">press release</a> and > +our <a href="$(HOME)/News/2008/20081023">press release</a> and > the <a href="releasenotes">Release Notes</a>.</p> Doesn't anyone see the irony in this? a.) It does just mention the point release update date, not of the original etch release. This could be considered a minor issue, if the next part wouldn't read: b.) "The release included many major changes", which it simply didn't, because c.) we even link to the point release announce which explicitly says that it "only updates some of the packages included". Is it really just me or are others also seeing a misconception here? So long, Rhonda
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil