On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:30:09 +0200 Laura Creighton wrote: > In a message of Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:04:17 +0200, Francesco Poli writes: > <snip> > > > >Actually, the MIT_License wikipedia page currently includes the > >Expat/MIT license, not the X11/MIT license. I would suggest to use the > >following link: > > > >Expat/MIT license: http://www.jclark.com/xml/copying.txt > > > >The so-called X11/MIT license uses a slightly different wording and > >also includes a clause forbidding unauthorized use of names in > >advertising. > > According to wikipedia that is a FSF-modified version of the MIT > license from 1998, first used with ncurses. So if you download that > maybe you will find the license you remember. Unfortunately, the license text I used to know as the X11 license[1] is similar to the ncurses license[2], but differs in many details. [1] see http://bugs.debian.org/284340 [2] http://invisible-island.net/ncurses/ncurses.faq.html#who_owns_it Thanks anyway. -- http://frx.netsons.org/doc/index.html#nanodocs The nano-document series is here! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpGGRCOuJgc1.pgp
Description: PGP signature