[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#472490: marked as done (packages.debian.org volatile archive referenced incorrectly)

Your message dated Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:33:06 +0200
with message-id <480D94B2.20302@kevin-price.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#472490: packages.debian.org volatile archive referenced incorrectly
has caused the Debian Bug report #472490,
regarding packages.debian.org volatile archive referenced incorrectly
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
472490: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=472490
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor

Hi!

Thank you very much for rebuilding packages.debian.org last year. Even
before that it was a very useful tool. The rebuild made it so much
better still. I was greatly impressed by such a high quality tool.

However, let me suggest one slight improvement: The download page of a
volatile package, for instance

  http://packages.debian.org/etch-volatile/amd64/clamav/download

says to insert this into my sources.list:

  deb http://volatile.debian.net/debian-volatile etch-volatile main
                                                    ^^^
which will lead to the following error:

  Failed to fetch
http://volatile.debian.net/debian-volatile/dists/etch-volatile/main/binary-amd64/Packages.gz
 404 Not Found

I have found the correct entry in sources.list to be:

  deb http://volatile.debian.net/debian-volatile etch/volatile main
                                                    ^^^
I can't tell if this error is caused by a programming bug or bad data.
Either way I suggest to correct it, if it can easily be done.

best regards

Kevin Price
-- 
http://www.kevin-price.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Frank Lichtenheld schrieb:
> Fixed

Confirmed, Thanks! :-)

Kevin

--- End Message ---
Reply to: