Re: apt-get vs Aptitude
- To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: apt-get vs Aptitude
- From: "Lukasz Szybalski" <szybalski@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:48:08 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 804e5c70804152048q536a880em6fd90a7f52c584b@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <20080320203045.GP13733@jax.donarmstrong.com>
- References: <804e5c70803191721s5221c44ax25553c2416e8fa1d@mail.gmail.com> <20080320013448.GY7406@rzlab.ucr.edu> <804e5c70803191930h649e9c6ci67ab04e2ebb94074@mail.gmail.com> <20080320024604.GA7406@rzlab.ucr.edu> <804e5c70803201320n62bddc86v6273879bbcdc4f3c@mail.gmail.com> <20080320203045.GP13733@jax.donarmstrong.com>
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
> > The reason I'm asking this is because it seems to me as 'apt-cache
> > policy ' belongs to apt-get group, and since we are recommending
> > aptitude I thought there would be aptitude version of apt-cache
> > policy.
>
> aptitude requires apt, so talking about apt-ceche policy when it's the
> right tool is fine.
>
So I switched over to aptitude but now I notice that aptitude installs
recommended packages as well.
So my
apt-get install python-epydoc -> 4mb
aptitude install python-epydoc -> Need to get 340MB of archives. After
unpacking 685MB will be used
I don't think that is what I have intended here. So now I am not sure
if I should suggest aptitude as it installs more then required.
How are you guys deal with this issue?
Lucas
Reply to: